Here's what it looks like on the NEX-7 with the LA-EA2 adapter
Both are manual focus lenses and require an adapter. The MD-NEX adapter were used on the Minolta MD 58/1.4 and the LA-EA2 adapter on the Voigtlander 58/1.4. Photos were lighted using 2 x 125W on both sides. No post processing was done except cropping.
And since I already have a Minolta 58/1.4, might as well see how this two lens compare.
Camera settings used were JPG - Standard, Neutral Picture Style, ISO100.
- This is not a scientific test and is purely based on what I personally look for in a lens. The other reason I am doing this test is to see which one has to go.
- And since its been cold and wet the past few weeks, the shots were taken indoors. Will be doing an outside shoot for comparison
- The reason for different field of view is because both lenses are focus using their MFD (Minimum Focusing Distance)
The bokeh is clearly 'creamier' on the Voigtlander. The Minolta MD 58/1.4 can still hold its own despite the fact that its a 20+ year old lens with no special coating that are used on newer lenses.
Overall I am happy with the Voigtlander output but I will soon change it back to it's native mount and use a Nikon-to-NEX adapter instead as the LA-EA2 adapter makes it a bulky combination. How I wish I didn't sell my LA-EA1 adapter.
Using the NEX-7 with either lens really shows the resolving power of the 24mp CMOS sensor that Sony incorporated on the camera.
If you are looking for a f/1.4 lens, I would recommend the Voigtlander if you are after the creamier bokeh, the price is a bit on the high-end. If you already own a Minolta 50/1.4 AF or the Sony 50/1.4 then these two lenses would be more useful with the LA-EA2 as they both auto-focuses and render almost similar bokeh.