Here's what it looks like on the NEX-7 with the LA-EA2 adapter
Both are manual focus lenses and require an adapter. The MD-NEX adapter were used on the Minolta MD 58/1.4 and the LA-EA2 adapter on the Voigtlander 58/1.4. Photos were lighted using 2 x 125W on both sides. No post processing was done except cropping.
And since I already have a Minolta 58/1.4, might as well see how this two lens compare.
Camera settings used were JPG - Standard, Neutral Picture Style, ISO100.
DISCLAIMER:
- This is not a scientific test and is purely based on what I personally look for in a lens. The other reason I am doing this test is to see which one has to go.
- And since its been cold and wet the past few weeks, the shots were taken indoors. Will be doing an outside shoot for comparison
- The reason for different field of view is because both lenses are focus using their MFD (Minimum Focusing Distance)
|
|
|
|
The bokeh is clearly 'creamier' on the Voigtlander. The Minolta MD 58/1.4 can still hold its own despite the fact that its a 20+ year old lens with no special coating that are used on newer lenses.
Overall I am happy with the Voigtlander output but I will soon change it back to it's native mount and use a Nikon-to-NEX adapter instead as the LA-EA2 adapter makes it a bulky combination. How I wish I didn't sell my LA-EA1 adapter.
Using the NEX-7 with either lens really shows the resolving power of the 24mp CMOS sensor that Sony incorporated on the camera.
If you are looking for a f/1.4 lens, I would recommend the Voigtlander if you are after the creamier bokeh, the price is a bit on the high-end. If you already own a Minolta 50/1.4 AF or the Sony 50/1.4 then these two lenses would be more useful with the LA-EA2 as they both auto-focuses and render almost similar bokeh.
No comments:
Post a Comment